[CH] A thoughtful man's view

Ed Johnson (ejohnso1@maine.rr.com)
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:17:32 -0400

With all the messages that have appeared here recently regarding
last week's tragedy, I hestitated to post this. Upon reflection,
I feel that I must post it. Please have patience and read it...

            ....Ed....

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

By Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)



Dear friends and fellow Americans 14 September, 2001
 
 
Like everyone else in this great country, I am reeling from last
week's  attack on our sovereignty. But unlike some, I am not
reeling from surprise.  As a career soldier and a student and
teacher of military history, I have a different perspective and I
think you should hear it. This war will be won or lost by the
American citizens, not diplomats, politicians or soldiers. Let me
briefly explain.

In spite of what the media, and even our own government is
telling us, this act was not committed by a group of mentally
deranged fanatics. To dismiss  them as such would be among the
gravest of mistakes. This attack was  committed by a ferocious,
intelligent and dedicated adversary. Don't take  this the wrong
way. I don't admire these men and I deplore their tactics, but I
respect their capabilities. The many parallels that have been
made with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor are apropos. Not
only because it  was a brilliant sneak attack against a
complacent America, but also because we may well be pulling our
new adversaries out of caves 30 years after we  think this war is
over, just like my father's generation had to do with the
formidable Japanese in the years following WWII.
 
 
 These men hate the United States with all of their being, and we
must not  underestimate the power of their moral commitment.
Napoleon, perhaps the  world's greatest combination of soldier
and statesman, stated "the moral is to the physical as three is
to one." Patton thought the Frenchman  underestimated its
importance and said moral conviction was five times more
important in battle than physical strength. Our enemies are
willing - better said anxious -- to give their lives for their
cause. How committed are we  America? And for how long?
 
 
 In addition to demonstrating great moral conviction, the recent
attack  demonstrated a mastery of some of the basic fundamentals
of warfare taught to most military officers worldwide, namely
simplicity, security and surprise. When I first heard rumors that
some of these men may have been trained at our own Air War
College, it made perfect sense to me. This was not a random act
of violence, and we can expect the same sort of military
competence to be  displayed in the battle to come. This war will
escalate, with a good portion of it happening right here in the
good ol' U.S. of A. These men will not go easily into the night.
They do not fear us. We must not fear them. 
 
 
 In spite of our overwhelming conventional strength as the
world's only  "superpower" (a truly silly term), we are the
underdog in this fight. As you listen to the carefully scripted
rhetoric designed to prepare us for the  march for war, please
realize that America is not equipped or seriously  trained for
the battle ahead. To be certain, our soldiers are much better 
than the enemy, and we have some excellent "counter-terrorist"
organizations, but they are mostly trained for hostage rescues,
airfield seizures, or the  occasional "body snatch," (which may
come in handy). We will be fighting a  war of annihilation,
because if their early efforts are any indication, our enemy is
ready and willing to die to the last man. Eradicating the enemy
will be costly and time consuming. They have already  deployed
their forces in as many as 20 countries, and are likely living
the lives of  everyday citizens. Simply put, our soldiers will be
tasked with a  search and destroy mission on multiple foreign
landscapes, and the public  must be patient and supportive until
the strategy and tactics can be worked out.
 
 
 For the most part, our military is still in the process of
redefining itself and presided over by men and women who grew up
with - and were promoted  because they excelled in - Cold War
doctrine, strategy and tactics. This will not be linear warfare,
there will be no clear "centers of gravity" to strike with high
technology weapons. Our vast technological edge will certainly
be  helpful, but it will not be decisive. Perhaps the perfect
metaphor for the  coming battle was introduced by the terrorists
themselves aboard the hijacked aircraft -- this will be a knife
fight, and it will be won or lost by the  ingenuity and will of
citizens and soldiers, not by software or smart bombs. We must
also be patient with our military leaders.
 
 
 Unlike Americans who are eager to put this messy time behind us,
our  adversaries have time on their side, and they will use it.
They plan to fight a battle of attrition, hoping to drag the
battle out until the American  public loses its will to fight.
This might be difficult to believe in this  euphoric time of flag
waving and patriotism, but it is generally acknowledged that
America lacks the stomach for a long fight. We need only look as
far  back as Vietnam, when North Vietnamese General Vo Nguyen
Giap (also a  military history teacher) defeated the United
States of America without ever winning a major tactical battle.
American soldiers who marched to war cheered on by flag waving
Americans in 1965 were reviled and spat upon less than  three
years later when they returned. Although we hope that Osama Bin
Laden is no Giap, he is certain to understand and employ the
concept. We can expect not only large doses of pain like the
recent attacks, but also less audacious "sand in the gears"
tactics, ranging from livestock infestations to attacks at water
supplies and power distribution facilities. 
 
 
 These attacks are designed to hit us in our "comfort zone"
forcing the  average American to "pay more and play less" and
eventually eroding our  resolve. But it can only work if we let
it. It is clear to me that the will of the American citizenry -
you and I - is the center of gravity the enemy  has targeted. It
will be the fulcrum upon which victory or defeat will turn.  He
believes us to be soft, impatient, and self-centered. He may be
right, but if so, we must change. The Prussian general Carl von
Clausewitz, (the most  often quoted and least read military
theorist in history), says that there is a "remarkable trinity of
war" that is composed of the (1) will of the people,  (2) the
political leadership of the government, and (3) the chance and 
probability that plays out on the field of battle, in that order.
Every  American citizen was in the crosshairs of last Tuesday's
attack, not just  those that were unfortunate enough to be  in
the World Trade Center or Pentagon. The will of the American
people will decide this war. If we are to win, it will be because
we have what it takes to persevere through a few more hits, learn
from our mistakes, improvise, and adapt. If we can do that, we
will eventually prevail.
 
 
 Everyone I've talked to In the past few days has shared a common
frustration,  saying in one form or another "I just wish I could
do something!" You are already doing it. Just keep faith in
America, and  continue to support your President and military,
and the outcome is certain.
 
 
 If we fail to do so, the outcome is equally certain.
 
 
 God Bless America
 
 
 Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
 
 
 Former Director of Military History, USAF Academy