Thank you Jim. Unfortunately you're beginning to sound like me!! >He *didn't* accuse them of cheating. He merely expressed good >scientific skepticism that a frutescens- which is what they claimed it >to be at the time- would test that high since no other known had ever >tested higher than 100 k. The skepticism was furthered by the total >lack of a response for either data or more information. -- -- Regards, Cameron