Re: [CH] Tobasco
Rael64 (z42dkm@yahoo.com)
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
It's actually an American acronym: Capsaicin Hidden In Little Edibles.
Peace, Hendrix, and C.H.I.L.E.......
Rael64
--- On Wed, 6/4/08, Tina Brooks <shoestring_louise@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Tina Brooks <shoestring_louise@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [CH] Tobasco
> To: "Chile Heads" <chile-heads@globalgarden.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008, 10:10 AM
> To my knowledge, Americans are the only ones who call them
> "Chile" everyone else calls them Chili or Chilli.
>
>
> =====
>
>
> Tina Brooks
> VP Marketing, Peppermaster Hot Sauces <a
> rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
> href="http://www.peppermaster.com">www.peppermaster.com
> </a>Brooks Pepperfire Foods Inc. <a
> rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
> href="http://www.pepperfire.ca">www.pepperfire.ca</a>
>
>
> Phone: (514) 393-3430
> 26 St. Jean Baptiste, East
> Rigaud, Quebec, Canada
> J0P 1P0
>
>
> Network with me on <a rel="nofollow"
> target="_blank"
> href="http://www.gourmetbusinessforum.com/">www.gourmetbusinessforum.com</a>
> -- The premier online business community for food
> professionals
>
>
> <em><font color="#ff0000">Many
> persons have a wrong idea of what constitutes true
> happiness. It is not attained through self-gratification
> but through fidelity to a worthy purpose.</font>
> <font color="#4040ff">Helen
> Keller</font></em>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: =Mark <mstevens@exit109.com>
> To: Byron <byronbromley@tellink.net>; Chile Heads
> <chile-heads@globalgarden.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 8:31:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [CH] Tobasco
>
> If Chile's was already the name of chiles, how does
> Chile's own the right to
> the name?
>
> On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:56:07 -0400, Byron wrote
> > A dumb question
> >
> > If tobasco was already the name of a Chile why
> does
> >
> > McIlhenny's own the rights to the name ??
> >
> > I can see if the restaurant used McIlhennys
> tobasco sauce as
> > a name
> >
> > I'm reminded of the red Savina Habanero
> patent, where the
> > terms Red and Habanero had to be dropped
> because there was a
> > red habanero already in production
> >
> > Kinda like Monsanto wanting to Patent Soil
> >
> > B.
>
>
> --
> =Mark
>
> http://www.exit109.com/~mstevens