Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: shadow1@pioneer.net: "Re: [CH] tamal-tomalley"
• Previous message: DG: "Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"
• Maybe in reply to: Pieters, Rob: "[CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"
• Next in thread: Console IIcx: "Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"

I thought the only way for a "hard bark" plant to do that was 
grafting...
-Shasta


>Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 10:04:56 -0700
>From: DG <zabre@gte.net>
>To: shadow1@pioneer.net
>CC: " (IPM Return requested)" <chile-heads@globalgarden.com>,
>        "Pieters, Rob (NL01)" <Rob.Pieters@Netherlands.honeywell.com>
>Subject: Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal
>Reply-To: DG <zabre@gte.net>
>
>A lot of fruit trees are grown from cuttings off the parent trees.
>
>shadow1@pioneer.net wrote:
>
>> I find this to be very interesting because if a plant that grows
>> fruit that has imputant seeds what happens. the original parent
>> plant has not produced any productive seeds when the original plant
>> dies does this not mean that the species dies as well.
>>
>> curiosity puzzels me.
>> hot regards
>> mark roache' " the master of shadows"
>
>
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

• Next message: shadow1@pioneer.net: "Re: [CH] tamal-tomalley"
• Previous message: DG: "Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"
• Maybe in reply to: Pieters, Rob: "[CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"
• Next in thread: Console IIcx: "Re: [CH] Saving Seed Becomes Illegal"