Re: [CH] Taco shells a follow up

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: tucker: "Re: [CH] Re: cranberries, introduction, hydroponics ...but without the"
• Previous message: Mary & Riley: "RE: [CH] cranberries"
• Maybe in reply to: byron bromley: "[CH] Taco shells a follow up"
• Next in thread: T: "Re: [CH] Taco shells a follow up"

Inagaddadavida wrote:
> 
> At 04:40 AM 11/19/00 -0800, Rich McCormack wrote:
> >
> >byron bromley wrote:
> >>
> >> F'n frightening
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> http://news.excite.com/news/r/001116/17/science-biotech-glickman-dc
> >
> >Indeed...it is frightening that a bunch of biotech "luddites"
> >can hold a hungry world hostage to their paranoid delusions and
> >anti-business agenda...
> 
> horse kaka, brother...a technology which has the *potential* to wreak havoc
> upon the environment is nothing to blindly accept in the name of
> "commerce/business"...

I rest my case!

-- 
Rich McCormack (Poway, CA) macknet@pacbell.net

Who is Rich McCormack?  Find out at...
http://home.pacbell.net/macknet/

• Next message: tucker: "Re: [CH] Re: cranberries, introduction, hydroponics ...but without the"
• Previous message: Mary & Riley: "RE: [CH] cranberries"
• Maybe in reply to: byron bromley: "[CH] Taco shells a follow up"
• Next in thread: T: "Re: [CH] Taco shells a follow up"