RE: [CH] LT's

Erich (edowe1@wi.rr.com)
Wed, 13 Dec 2006 21:00:10 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Erich: "RE: [CH] LT's"
Previous message: Sandy Olson: "Re: [CH] LT's"
In reply to: Byron: "[CH] LT's"
Next in thread: Sandy Olson: "Re: [CH] LT's"

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-chile-heads@globalgarden.com
[mailto:owner-chile-heads@globalgarden.com] On Behalf Of Byron
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 7:41 PM
To: Chile Heads
Subject: [CH] LT's

FWIW

Lt's

Army 
2nd LT
1st LT
LT Colonel
LT Gen 

Navy
Lt
LT Commander
LT  Junior Grade

http://www.princetonreview.com/cte/articles/military/paygrades.asp

Since Father Jims BIL  was a Lt. Gen.,  Lost in 911,  personal prefernce

is  to  NOT use this
one.

Thanks

L.B.

 Hmmm, so Lt. Major wouldn't be a real rank then?  I can almost feel ok
with accepting Sandy's promotion if it's to a non-existent ranking.

  Lt. Commander would be cool though... just like Data...
  <<Geek mode off>>

--
Erich
C-H # 2099 & First Lieutenant of the Moderate Corps... for now

Next message: Erich: "RE: [CH] LT's"
Previous message: Sandy Olson: "Re: [CH] LT's"
In reply to: Byron: "[CH] LT's"
Next in thread: Sandy Olson: "Re: [CH] LT's"