I think you missed something..... On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:41:37PM -0700, Dana H. Myers wrote: > Jim Graham wrote: >> So don't automatically assume that someone's poor choices are the >> cause of their excess weight. I'd guess that that's true most of >> the time, but you simply can't tell just by looking Re-read that a few times, and compare it with this: > Sure - you're right. Illness sometimes takes our choices away, > pushes us into a corner. Statistics suggest that something like > 1.5% of North Americans are diagnosed with cancer in a 5-year > period, while something like like 35% are currently obese. Numerically, > cancer as a cause of obesity is far outweighed by sedentary, over- > consuming lifestyles, so I'll stand by my general assertion. First you agree with me, then you disagree. I did say that I would guess (or, if you prefer, assume) that most of the time, you're right. My point was that this is not ALWAYS the case, and that you cannot automatically make that assumption based solely on appearances. Your "general assertion" seems to suggest that you CAN automatically make that assumption. In the unlikely event that you should ever see me somewhere (without knowing who I am), you'd assume that about me, wouldn't you? Thanks a whole fsking lot.... -- 73 DE N5IAL (/4) | Peter da Silva: No, try "rm -rf /" spooky130@cox.net | Dave Aronson: As your life flashes before < Running FreeBSD 6.1 > | your eyes, in the unit of time known as an ICBM / Hurricane: | ohnosecond.... (alt.sysadmin.recovery) 30.39735N 86.60439W |