FYI, I've emailed Mike to see if I can help out. I will not be posting further on anything that may be divisive towards list ownership. Apologies if I have offended folks in anyway. cheers Mark E. in Oz ___________ zymurgia.com On 17/06/2008, at 12:24 PM, Mark Ellis wrote: > G'day Doug, > > Your kind of missing the point a wee bit here. This issue comes up > every couple of months, and has for the last 3-4 years. > > For the record, I am happy, I'm subscribed, I can post, and I like > the format. In of itself, the list works ok. > > But I do EXPECT that Mike, be a active presence on the list, as I do > any list-owner - I have several lists myself so I know what I > babbling on about here. > > I do also EXPECT that if the list majordomo management scripts are > screwy, that they be fixed ASAP. It's not rocket science(as Jim > pointed out), and it is basic list management 101. > > That is what I EXPECT, and as a member of well over 10 years, you > kind of get sick of the silent echo to concerns, that are not acted > upon. I have no intention of jumping ship, but we need to make > things better for our group. It is our duty. How can I help? Does > anyone have Mike's current email, so I can go direct to the man > wearing the pants? > > > cheers > Mark E. in Oz > ___________ > zymurgia.com > > > > > On 17/06/2008, at 12:07 PM, Doug Irvine wrote: > >> Brent Thompson wrote: >>>> I don't want to step on anyone's toes either but we need a better >>>> system. >>> What exactly is wrong with the current system, besides some >>> subscription >>> confusion from time-to-time? >>> This e-mail system is fast and comes via a method I already must >>> consult >>> constantly for work, all day long. No extra time required to see >>> these >>> chile-heads e-mails means I have the time to see them. And >>> everyone else >>> who reads e-mail is also getting these e-mails delivered right >>> where they >>> already are reading, too. >>> I personally very much dislike groups, including Yahoo groups, >>> because in >>> contrast to our current method, they are slower to read, slower to >>> delete, >>> slower and more inconvenient to search, etc., and also require >>> various >>> extraordinary steps that are inconvenient for me, such as logging >>> into and >>> checking some website that otherwise has nothing to do with my life. >>> I don't think of myself as a Luddite just because I don't like >>> slower, more >>> inconvenient ways of doing something that already works well. >>> --- Brent >> >> One and all! Mike has run HIS list since the 90's and barring a few >> little problems along the way, has run it well and efficiently and >> I for one would like to see it stay that way. And I do not think >> that is a Luddite mentality either, just in the event that some >> think, because of my advanced age, that I was around when the >> Luddites were! So waht that globalgarden.com are sometimes a bit of >> a problem, that server has worked well over all the years that Mike >> has been using it, with some little blips, as I said. So, bear with >> it. Just because a few are having a small problem, due to their >> inability to remember where they are supposed to be if they un sub, >> or how to get back if they do, is no reason to start a cry a furor >> to get a new list. Be content with what you have. It works! >> Cheers, then OLD Luddite like Brent:-))! Cheers, Doug in BC