Re: [CH] Comcast
Jim Graham (spooky130@cox.net)
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:25:40 -0500
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:40:37PM -0500, Jim Graham wrote:
[information about temporary solutions for getting e-mail via an
alternate route until Comcast users and Comcast get the real
problem sorted out]
Ok, I've now been informed that trying to help was a massively
bad thing to have done. My apologies to everyone on the list
for trying to be helpful. It seemed like a good thing to do...I
guess I was wrong.
So take the two e-mails I sent with the info and delete them.
They are apparently useless [let's see, how did scottp put it?
Ah, yes...] "3L337 jargon". Definitely not worth the time (not
much time, but still) I put into trying to find answers (pointers
to software) for both Unix and Windows folks. Once again, I
apologize for trying.
I think I'll go into permanent lurk mode...seems like every time I
post, I end up pissing someone off or starting a heated discussion.
I don't need either, and it's not what I'm on this list for.
Later,
--jim
--
73 DE N5IAL (/4) | "This 'telephone' has too many
spooky130@cox.net | shortcomings to be seriously considered
< Running FreeBSD 6.1 > | as a means of communication. The device
ICBM / Hurricane: | is inherently of no value to us."
30.39735N 86.60439W | (Western Union internal memo, 1876)