Re: [CH] Substantiate everything

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Marc Norman: "[CH] sigs"
• Previous message: Bradley A. Halldin: "[CH] Question: Anyone Preserved in Brandy???"
• Maybe in reply to: Roy Stiel: "[CH] Substantiate everything"
• Next in thread: H0T5AUCE@aol.com: "Re: [CH] Substantiate everything"

>Of course, I came in and took
>on the biggest vulture. I'm not a sheep. 

No, a Hyena would be a more appropriate description.

>I'm not afraid to stand alone and I won't 
>be intimidated. 

Nor will you back up your lie with facts.  Now, why is that?

>If I'm not correct then why are they still 
>talking about one email I posted two weeks ago? 

Because you have yet to appologise or back up your so-called allegations.

>The Cage Rattler

More correct if the word cage is left off.

>*uck you *ick head. 

You really have a way with words.

Tom

• Next message: Marc Norman: "[CH] sigs"
• Previous message: Bradley A. Halldin: "[CH] Question: Anyone Preserved in Brandy???"
• Maybe in reply to: Roy Stiel: "[CH] Substantiate everything"
• Next in thread: H0T5AUCE@aol.com: "Re: [CH] Substantiate everything"