Re: [CH] FAQ - Recipies ?

=Mark (mstevens@exit109.com)
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:34:00 -0500 

Folks over on the FoodWine list are in the midst of compiling a cookbook 
commemorating their 10th Anniversary.

=Mark


At 05:06 PM 1/15/2003 -0500, AndyB wrote:


>Brent Thompson wrote:
> >
> > > Should Chile recipes be included on the FAQ site ?
> >
> > This is purely a matter of site-owner's choice.
>
>No, it is not.
>I have solicited opinions as to whether this type of info should be on the 
>FAQ. I plan to abide by the consensus of the list.
>
>I have also solicited for a "committee" to review/approve the content.
>Until I get such endorsement, I will keep the site "Unofficial".
>
>So far yours is the only negative reply from the list regarding recipes.
>I have already received several positive replies.
>As I said in previous emails, I would not choose the recipes,
>rather, I let the list select.
>
> > This FAQ discussion has been about an 'official' chile-heads FAQ which,
> > until reappearance of the chile-heads web site, would have to be at some
> > temporary site (and might forever remain at more sites than just the
> > chile-heads web site).
> >
> > Including chile recipes in a chile-heads FAQ makes no sense, though it is
> > imaginable that consensus might be to put pointers to several sites along
> > with other clues to help readers find recipes they want, in answer to the
> > possible question, "where can I find chile-related recipes?", if that is a
> > frequently asked question.
> >
> > But other than the chile-heads FAQ itself, whatever else might be available
> > from the same site as the chile-heads FAQ is unrelated, and irrelevant, to
> > the chile-heads FAQ,
>
>That is why, if you bothered to notice, I have made no tie-in/link to my 
>personal website, nor does my name appear on the CHL FAQ part.  (My email 
>does, in case someone has technical trouble with the page.)
>
> > and is only a matter of preference by the owner of that site.
>
>Again, as stated above, I completely disagree with you.
>However, it is up to the collective list decision, and the moderator, 
>whether we should have an "official site".  The content of any "official" 
>site should be reviewed/approved in some manner -- independent of where it 
>is placed.
>
>In that regard, I am merely trying to get the ball rolling, and to collect 
>some opinions.
>I certainly have yours now.
>
> >  ---   Brent
>
>AndyB