[CH] Moz v IE
Byron (byronbromley@tellink.net)
Sun, 05 Sep 2004 22:49:25 -0400
Dave
The main option I like about MW v Mozilla is I can delete an incomming
e-mail at the server w/o downloading it. Example If someone I don't
know is sending me a 100kb attachment I can delete at server. Another
is I can block a complete server like junk from .ru I can just do
*@.ru.com and any junk from there is deleted . I can't do that with
TBird. Just less tweaking
M$ after the last SP2 update still had 18 out of 58 security holes
that they didn't fix, one dates back to Winders 95 or almost 10 years
ago, Mozilla has 4 out of 11 but those are to cover M$'s butt
Linux yup next wet spell I am trying SuSe Personal 9.1 You can
operatate the system from a CD = So far viruses can't infect ($ 39.95
with manual + free on line help)
L.B.
who would rather be reading about chiles than going thru all this crap
Mozilla is a great browser/emailer. I've been using it since Netscrap
went over to the dark side (AOL) and tossed all the core programmers -
who went to (guess where) Mozilla. There is also a Linux version of
Mozilla. I haven't seen the need for Mailwasher as the spam catcher in
Thunderbird (Mozilla's Stand Alone e-mailer) and the definable filters
automatically send 99% of my spam to the JUNK folder.
And it doesn't have the security holes of I