Re: [CH] Tobasco
=Mark (mstevens@exit109.com)
Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:31:19 -0400
If Chile's was already the name of chiles, how does Chile's own the right to
the name?
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:56:07 -0400, Byron wrote
> A dumb question
>
> If tobasco was already the name of a Chile why does
>
> McIlhenny's own the rights to the name ??
>
> I can see if the restaurant used McIlhennys tobasco sauce as
> a name
>
> I'm reminded of the red Savina Habanero patent, where the
> terms Red and Habanero had to be dropped because there was a
> red habanero already in production
>
> Kinda like Monsanto wanting to Patent Soil
>
> B.
--
=Mark
http://www.exit109.com/~mstevens