[CH] Re: Evil corporate types

chilehead@tough-love.com
Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:18:18 -0400

Sorry Jimbo, 

Those are appelations, grown in a certain area. Tabasco is grown everywhere 
but Tabasco. 

Dave
TLCC 

> RE:  But for me, what's always been bothersome is that the tabasco chile
> is owner, as it were, of the name "tabasco", 
> 
> Well- this isn't uncommon though in food, and there are a myriad of
> other examples, some closer to the 'mark' (!) and others not.  Hmmm....
> nearly all of them I can think of come from the wine world.  I suppose I
> ought to get my head out of the bottle a bit more :-) 
> 
> "Champagne" can only be applied to that sparkling wine made in that
> region of France, no matter where I grow the champagne grapes. 
> 
> Make a wine with the Sangiovese grape and you have an outstanding full
> bodied red wine.  Make it in a certain region of Italy and it will be
> called "Chianti". 
> 
> "Bordeaux" might be a closer example.  You can grow those grapes
> anywhere, but if you do, don't try calling it by that name :-) 
> 
> Although I can't think of them at the moment, I belive there are also
> examples in the cheese world as well as other segments of the food
> industry.  The drive to take a regional product out into the world,
> market it, and protect it based on some sense of it's supposed
> uniqueness, is not limited to Tabasco and they are hardly the first. 
> I'm not defending them as to the particulars of any given case, only
> pointing out that they are simply playing by the established rules of
> the game.  I know firsthand that they've had to withdraw a marketing
> campaign because it was pointed out to them that they were stepping on
> someone else's mark.  As this was/is a guy who hasn't sold as much sauce
> in a lifetime as Tabasco has in a day, the Trademark law served him
> well.  It works both ways.  It's a bit hypocritical to celebrate the law
> working for the little guy, but NOT when it works for the 'big guy'. 
> That's why Justice wears a blindfold ;-) 
> 
> Again- the law REQUIRES us as business owners to protect the mark to the
> fullest extent of our abilities or we lose it.  Some just have more
> resources and abilities than others ;-)    
> 
> -Jim
> http://www.StepUpforCharity.org