Re: [CH] posting problems (was List Future)
Rael64 (z42dkm@yahoo.com)
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
That 'not personally aware' got me thinking.
Might some folks be composing an email, telling their browser to send in 'plain text', but have also set up a default attach a sig., quotes, etc., to all outgoing emails, which is in some sort of non-plain text, so the instruction to send as plain text is essentially countermanded by the attach sig. command?
(keep thinking this was a problem on another email list I was on; many of us were grousing about the HUGE PINK signature we kept getting w/this person's posts; she claimed to be sending non-html, but forgot she had a default sig.)
Anyway...
Peace, Hendrix, and Chiles.......
Rael64
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, Brent Thompson <brent@kanha.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> Recently mentioned on this list is the issue of plain-text
> vs. html other
> attachments: only plain-text-only posts are accepted by
> chile-heads.
>
> But tiny little system differences can occur and can make a
> big difference,
> even if you aren't necessarily personally aware that
> changes have occurred.