On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:25:48AM -0700, Riley J. McIntire wrote: > But some management is needed, and it's not getting done. If Mike's ...not being notified of problems by an e-mail to the owner-chile-heads address, it's not his fault. If that address is a black hole, then we have a problem. The last time I had a problem with the list (I'd forgotten about not using majordomo@globalgarden.com for the confirm e-mail), I got a prompt response. That was when I re-subbed to the list after I got back on the net (after cancer took me away for a while). > As, I think, Jim G. pointed out, an active list needs _active_ > management. No, that wasn't me...because I haven't questioned the fact that the list already HAS a list owner. I've merely questioned whether he's being informed by the people having problems that they're having problems. If he's not, then nobody has any legitimate reason to expect ANYTHING _from him. Later, --jim -- 73 DE N5IAL (/4) MiSTie #49997 < Running FreeBSD 6.1 > spooky130@cox.net || j.graham@ieee.org ICBM/Hurr.: 30.39735N 86.60439W "Now what *you* need is a proper pint of porter poured in a proper pewter porter pot.." --Peter Dalgaard in alt.sysadmin.recovery