Re: [CH] Re: I suppose it had to happen...spam on the list :-(
Rael64 (z42dkm@yahoo.com)
Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Two to me directly; two to the list.
Peace...
Rael
--- On Sat, 6/21/08, Jim Graham <spooky130@cox.net> wrote:
> From: Jim Graham <spooky130@cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [CH] Re: I suppose it had to happen...spam on the list :-(
> To: chile-heads@globalgarden.com
> Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 3:39 PM
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 04:28:36PM -0400, =Mark wrote:
> > I only got the two messages from the list, none got
> through to my inbox...
>
> Perhaps I should re-phrase that question.... Whether it
> made it through
> your spam filters or not, did anyone else get any direct
> copies? My
> procmail rules caught it, too (HTML == spam), but that
> wasn't the point.
> I'm interested in how many e-mail addresses the spammer
> grabbed from the
> list, and for that, it doesn't matter whether it got
> THROUGH your spam
> filters...it only matters whether or not it was sent to
> your address.
>
> Later,
> --jim
>
> --
> 73 DE N5IAL (/4) | DMR: So fsck was originally
> called
> spooky130@cox.net | something else.
> < Running FreeBSD 6.1 > | Q: What was it called?
> ICBM / Hurricane: | DMR: Well, the second letter was
> different.
> 30.39735N 86.60439W | -- Dennis M. Ritchie, Usenix,
> June 1998.