Dana H. Myers wrote: > Rael64 wrote: >> Oops. I fergot this: Many of those name-specific wines, cheese, >> etc. are given > > such protective status to ensure not only authenticity but, unlike a > trademark, > > a limitation of production (which, I assume, keeps prices high). > Only a certain > > amount of a specific wine (chianti, for example) is allowed. Extra > grapes/juice, > > etc. must be left to rot, mixed, or whatever, and anything above and > beyond the > > limit cannot be called 'chianti.' > > Can't such wine just be declassified? Not mixed, just labeled > differently. > > Dana > With all due respect to the esteemed Chile Monk, some of his point is not entirely correct. It's not that you can't produce all the Chianti you want - but you can't call it Chianti if you make it in Calabria. Likewise, if I feel like it I can distill a fine malt from toasted barley (over peat, even) here in southern Indiana - but I can't call it Scotch because it's not being made in Scotland. And to Dana's point, that declassification is happening. See a wine in the store labeled "Sangiovese"? That's Chianti without the regional label.