Re: [CH] Bullshit detectors.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: =Mark: "Re: [CH] Too Phat"
• Previous message: J. Patrick Donohoe: "Re: [CH] Trend??"
• In reply to: Tina Brooks: "Re: [CH] Bullshit detectors."
• Next in thread: =Mark: "Re: [CH] Bullshit detectors."

Tina Brooks wrote:

> I am not an organic chemist but I do know the difference between semantics and bullshit. And it seems to me that you just said that they bleach sugar.

I did. It's part of the regular process of refining. So, what?

> Don't bother to email me offlist anymore Dave, I'm not about to keep it there. I'm not afraid of being embarrassed by your words.

You should be more afraid of your own words used in mis-statement.
NYAH! NYAH! NYAH!

You don't read and comprehend well at all, do you? I have replied to 
you one last time - off list.

Any others who care may request a copy from me (also off list) showing 
how she sets 'em up and I knock 'em down.

I think the rest of us are ready to get back to chilies and let Grunt 
Cakes stew in her own "politically correct juices."

-- 
ENJOY!!!

 From Uncle Dirty Dave's Kitchen
Home of YAHOOOOAHHHH Hot Sauce & Hardin Cider

... Ethics are so annoying. I avoid them on principle. -- Darby Conley

• Next message: =Mark: "Re: [CH] Too Phat"
• Previous message: J. Patrick Donohoe: "Re: [CH] Trend??"
• In reply to: Tina Brooks: "Re: [CH] Bullshit detectors."
• Next in thread: =Mark: "Re: [CH] Bullshit detectors."