Re: [CH] Substantiate everything

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Doug Irvine: "Re: [CH] OT: Champignons et al"
• Previous message: Coyote: "[CH] the list..."
• Maybe in reply to: Roy Stiel: "[CH] Substantiate everything"
• Next in thread: T: "Re: [CH] Substantiate everything"

<bitch>
Dear Cage Rattler,
How long have you been on this list for anyway? Seems that
every time I read a post with your name on it, it's either
an accusation, a defense, or an ENTIRE post that I've already
read. Maybe YOU <gasp!> could contribute something positive one
of these days since <and I quote> "Sadly, I have found very
little useful info on this list. If you'll notice after reading
a couple of weeks the same things are repeated over and over 
and over and over." </quote> Gee, *I* have found a hell of alot
of useful info on this list, along with many laughs (Rael, put
away the twooster sheet for a bit honey, we need you here on the
list!) Maybe if you didn't join the list in "attack mode" you
wouldn't feel so ummmm, dare I say PaRaNoId? And wondering...
<and I quote> "I came in and took on the biggest vulture. I'm not
a sheep. I'm not afraid to stand alone and I won't be intimidated." 
</quote> So WHO is this biggest vulture? And have YOU had any personal
or professional dealings with him or her? And if you haven't, then
WHY START TROUBLE? HUH?? sheesh.... post a recipe or something!
Oh yeah, and PLEASE figure out how to NOT REPOST the entire letter
that you're responding to. Very poor netiquette...  :)
</bitch>
-- 
Valerie <who DOES lurk, is NOT intimidated by anyone on the list
and has PMS tonite, can ya tell? ahhh now I feel better!!>
aka: Breeze
ICQ# 3953329
http://www2.crosswinds.net/~breeze62/peppers.html

• Next message: Doug Irvine: "Re: [CH] OT: Champignons et al"
• Previous message: Coyote: "[CH] the list..."
• Maybe in reply to: Roy Stiel: "[CH] Substantiate everything"
• Next in thread: T: "Re: [CH] Substantiate everything"